My answer to the title question is simply, sh!tass lucky. Billions and billions of totally unrelated and
directly connected events conspired to result in one place among billions and
billions that was able to sustain life and billions of random chemical events
resulted in life actually being created and adapting and getting more and more
complex until we ended up with beings ordering "quad venti half caf breve no foam with
whip two splenda stirred skinny three pump peppermint mochas" at Starbucks.
Who reading this wasn't affected by Carl Sagan's TV series Cosmos (I even have a copy of the book) and his stories of "Billions and Billions"
of stars with "Billions and Billions" of planets... We humans got the big door prize. If we weren't created, then there would be no one around to notice we're not here...
But what does this have to do with the politics of global
warming? Not much.
Back to the regular programming.
Now that Trenberth's theory of all the heat caused by human greed being cooled off by the oceans is disproven (although the 2nd Law of
Thermodynamics was a hint that it would be) what do we know about anthropogenic
catastrophic global warming climate change?
Everyone - every climate skeptic and every alarmist - agrees
that Greenhouse Gases warm the climate. Indeed, without GHGs we would be living
(actually wouldn't be living) on a very cold marble indeed.
And some percentage of
people who look at the climate (pretty much 100% of whom make their
living writing reports that prove the evil than men doeth) insist that increases in CO2
causes extreme global temperatures and even acts as an accelerant. (I won't
bother arguing against the fact that CO2 is benign and far more is produced
naturally than by humans. Everyone knows that...)
But suppose that O2 IS poison and DOES result in runaway
temperatures. Why have temperatures levelled off for almost two decades?
You guessed it.... Sh!tass luck.
It seems that there is some natural process that allows CO2 levels to increase - even double - and somehow not have any significant effect on global temperatures.
It seems that there is some natural process that allows CO2 levels to increase - even double - and somehow not have any significant effect on global temperatures.
We're saved by billions and billions of sh!tty little lucky events
3 comments:
Except temperatures have been rising.
Bullshit.
You think people don't notice the weather over the last 10 years? Sure the NOAA adjust temp stats so they can keep telling the lies and collecting the cash.
I like the way Jo Nova describes how the data are manipulated
http://joannenova.com.au/2015/01/man-made-adjustments-turn-cooling-in-paraguay-south-america-to-warming/
Post a Comment